Publicación:
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review

dc.citation.volume6
dc.contributor.authorTennant, Jonathan P.
dc.contributor.authorDugan, Jonathan M.
dc.contributor.authorGraziotin, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorJacques, Damien Christophe
dc.contributor.authorWaldner, François
dc.contributor.authorMietchen, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorElkhatib, Yehia
dc.contributor.authorB. Collister, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorPikas, Christina K.
dc.contributor.authorCrick, Tom
dc.contributor.authorMasuzzo, Paola
dc.contributor.authorCaravaggi, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Devin R.
dc.contributor.authorNiemeyer, Kyle E.
dc.contributor.authorRoss-Hellauer, Tony
dc.contributor.authorMannheimer, Sara
dc.contributor.authorRigling, Lillian
dc.contributor.authorKatz, Daniel S.
dc.contributor.authorGreshake Tzovaras, Bastian
dc.contributor.authorPacheco Mendoza, Josmel
dc.contributor.authorFatima, Nazeefa
dc.contributor.authorPoblet, Marta
dc.contributor.authorIsaakidis, Marios
dc.contributor.authorIrawan, Dasapta Erwin
dc.contributor.authorRenaut, Sebastien
dc.contributor.authorMadan, Christopher R.
dc.contributor.authorMatthias, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorNørgaard Kjær, Jesper
dc.contributor.authorO'Donnell, Daniel Paul
dc.contributor.authorNeylon, Cameron
dc.contributor.authorKearns, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorSelvaraju, Manojkumar
dc.contributor.authorColomb, Julien
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-12T16:36:20Z
dc.date.available2019-02-12T16:36:20Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractPeer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of its importance, the status and purpose of peer review is often contested. What is its role in our modern digital research and communications infrastructure? Does it perform to the high standards with which it is generally regarded? Studies of peer review have shown that it is prone to bias and abuse in numerous dimensions, frequently unreliable, and can fail to detect even fraudulent research. With the advent of web technologies, we are now witnessing a phase of innovation and experimentation in our approaches to peer review. These developments prompted us to examine emerging models of peer review from a range of disciplines and venues, and to ask how they might address some of the issues with our current systems of peer review. We examine the functionality of a range of social Web platforms, and compare these with the traits underlying a viable peer review system: quality control, quantified performance metrics as engagement incentives, and certification and reputation. Ideally, any new systems will demonstrate that they out-perform and reduce the biases of existing models as much as possible. We conclude that there is considerable scope for new peer review initiatives to be developed, each with their own potential issues and advantages. We also propose a novel hybrid platform model that could, at least partially, resolve many of the socio-technical issues associated with peer review, and potentially disrupt the entire scholarly communication system. Success for any such development relies on reaching a critical threshold of research community engagement with both the process and the platform, and therefore cannot be achieved without a significant change of incentives in research environments.es_ES
dc.description.peer-reviewRevisado por pareses_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.12688/f1000research.12037.3
dc.identifier.issn2046-1402
dc.identifier.journalF1000Researches_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14005/8560
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14005/8560
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.publisherFaculty of 1000 Ltdes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofF1000Research
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceUniversidad San Ignacio de Loyolaes_ES
dc.sourceRepositorio Institucional - USILes_ES
dc.subjectTerminología científicaes_ES
dc.subjectInformación científicaes_ES
dc.titleA multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer reviewes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2017_Pacheco-Mendoza.pdf
Tamaño:
3.37 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
403 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: